For anyone interested, NATCA Reloaded will be conducting 6 NATCA 101 classes via Go-To-Meeting over the next three months. Great class to introduce the history of NATCA to the new generation or a great reminder of why we do this for our seasoned vets. If you have time, I strongly recommend. Thanks for your time.
To echo Troy's email, this facility is already compliant with the memo. The mention of keeping stints under 2 hours is a "should" and not "shall". The prohibition of splitting mids is something that we do naturally anyway because the entirety of all our mids have hours of overlap on the front or back ends of the shift. 2 people are not solely responsible for 8 hours. The things that will catch the eyes of management is the appearance of stints that far exceed the 2 hour mark or a mid-partner not being re-callable.
For example, 2 people on the mid relieve everyone off the floor. Before they go to 1, they should try and break up the first stint with a brief break to reset the time. If not, the result could be the appearance of being plugged in upwards of 3 1/2 hours.
Another example is not signing in when relieving someone in the middle of the mid-shift. This could also lend to the appearance of a lengthy stint. Although both are easily justified, it could still raise questions.
The other national interest item of this is the ability to recall a mid-partner. If you need to go off-site for food or coffee, Art 33 sec 2 procedures are still applicable. Tell the OM so they know if an area is now truly single person ops. Other than that, be available throughout the mid.
Again, we are compliant with the memo at ZSE. Minor tweaks could help keep eyes off of you, but, we do not have any of the problems that the national guidance is trying to fix. As Troy said, if you hear anything more restrictive from management please let any one of your reps know.
The following story is via our NNM Legislative Rep, Richard Kennington
Mike Lillis August 24, 2017 - 06:02 AM EDT
The chances of a government shutdown in the fall are growing.
Congress returns to Washington next month facing a full plate of must-pass legislation and a shutdown threat that looks more serious after President Trump suggested on Tuesday he won’t support a spending package that omits new funds for a southern border wall.
“Believe me, if we have to close down our government, we’re building that wall,” he said during a fiery rally in Phoenix.
Trump’s shutdown threat is just the latest headache for the Republicans, who are already scrambling to mend deep internal divisions among rank-and-file members, manage disintegrating relations between Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell(R-Ky.) and contain the fallout from the president’s equivocating response to the deadly violence at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va., earlier this month.
Increasingly pressured to demonstrate their governing chops, GOP leaders have insisted they’ll pass the spending bills in time to keep the government running beyond Oct. 1, when funding expires. And Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) pushed back on Wednesday at Trump’s suggestion that border wall funding is worth a shutdown.
“I don’t think a government shutdown is necessary, and I don’t think most people want to see a government shutdown, ourselves included,” Ryan said during a visit to an Intel facility in Oregon.
Of Trump’s threat, Ryan said the president is merely “employing a strategy that he thinks is effective for him.”
Yet with just 12 legislative days scheduled for September — and the spending debate complicated by a Sept. 29 deadline to raise the debt ceiling — the Republicans have little room for error. And Trump’s shutdown threat poses yet another hurdle, forcing GOP leaders to find a legislative sweet spot that satisfies the president’s border-wall demand without alienating the Democrats, whose votes will be essential to keep the government running.
Responding to Trump’s tough talk in Phoenix, the Democrats are drawing red lines of opposition to any new border-wall funding — and all but daring Trump to follow through on his threat.
“Democrats have made clear we will not support funding for President Trump’s misguided, ineffective border wall,” Rep. Joseph Crowley (N.Y.), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, warned Wednesday in an email to The Hill.
“If President Trump and Republicans insist on wasting taxpayers’ money, they will be to blame for any government shutdown.”
The sentiment is widely shared among Democrats — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) issued similar statements Wednesday — and they’ll have plenty of leverage in the fight.
Ryan has struggled to secure enough GOP votes to pass fiscal bills in the face of opposition from conservative deficit hawks, leaning heavily on Pelosi to get those measures to the president’s desk. And Schumer’s filibuster power means McConnell will need at least eight Democrats to move border-wall funding through the upper chamber — an unlikely prospect.
Indeed, a House-passed bill providing $1.6 billion for border-wall construction has gone nowhere in the Senate.
Trump, however, has made the border wall a top priority since the first day of his campaign, and he’s grown increasingly frustrated at the Republicans’ failure to give him a victory. In May, after Democrats successfully stripped a 2017 spending package of funding for new border-wall construction, Trump reluctantly signed the bill — but not before warning Republicans to hold a harder line in the 2018 spending fight.
“Our country needs a good ‘shutdown’ in September to fix mess!” Trump tweeted at the time.
His remarks in Phoenix are evidence that he’s prepared to double down — and use the bully pulpit to press his case.
GOP leaders are well aware of the political perils of a shutdown. The Republicans suffered the brunt of the public backlash over a spending impasse in 2013, when the government closed its doors for 16 days amid a conservative push to repeal ObamaCare — an effort that ultimately failed. Party leaders are clambering to prevent a similar scenario from occurring while they control all levels of power in Washington.
Trump’s public attacks on McConnell won’t diminish the challenge facing Republicans. McConnell failed last month to secure the 51 votes needed to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill, leading the president to lash out in tweets and statements that the Kentucky Republican, known as a master tactician, is proving simply ineffective.
Trump kept the feud going on Wednesday by amplifying previous calls for Senate leaders to eliminate the filibuster — something McConnell has rejected out of hand.
With Congress away from Washington for the long August recess, it’s unclear how much progress has been made in the government spending debate. John Kelly, Trump’s new chief of staff, had reached out to congressional Democrats late last month seeking common ground on issues like infrastructure and tax reform. But there have been no subsequent conversations with the White House about the looming spending fight or the border wall, a Democratic leadership aide said Wednesday.
The office of House Appropriations Committee Chairman Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.) declined to comment. But GOP appropriators, who have long opposed any effort to shutter the government, are carrying that sentiment into next month’s debate.
With time running thin, Congress is expected to approve a short-term continuing resolution that would fund the government, largely at current levels, for several months, potentially kicking thornier issues like the border wall to later in the year.
Because new border-wall funding was not included in the 2017 omnibus, the continuing resolution would not provide new money for the border wall unless Republicans insist on it.
The debt-ceiling hike may also be thrown in as part of the package — a move that would alienate conservatives and make Democratic support that much more necessary.
Republicans may have some wiggle room as they walk a line between the Democrats and the president. That’s because Democrats, while adamantly opposed to new wall construction, have shown a willingness to accept other provisions that bolster border security — things like repairing existing sections of the wall and adopting high-tech border surveillance measures.
Indeed, Democrats claimed a resounding victory in the 2017 omnibus bill despite the inclusion of $1.1 billion in “border security technologies and infrastructure improvement.”
Below is an update from Anthony Goodwin, ZSE NATCA tech rep. If you have any questions, please either post them on this site or you can privately email him at ZGgood2@comcast.net.
Hi from your ZSE NATCA Facility Tech Rep. I represent ZSE NATCA on the National User Team, DataComm, and NextGen. Here’s an update on what’s happening that affects us here at ZSE:
EAD600: ZSE upleveled to ERAM build EAD60300 on June 14. As you know by now, EAD6 contains the VCI (Visual Comm Indicator) and several datablock changes. The datablock changes include improved leader line anchor points and improved target location for /0.
A reminder, the VCI was deployed in EAD6 so controllers would get used to marking aircraft on freq before DataComm is deployed. In DataComm, an aircraft must be marked on freq before uplinks can be sent to that aircraft.
VCI usage at ZSE will become mandatory (by agreement) approximately July 15. I don’t know what, if any, enforcement will be used. I would expect it to follow whatever method supes are currently using to enforce the use of a visual comm indicator. I haven’t personally ever seen any supervisor do this.
We (the National User Team) are working on an enhancement that would allow the VCI “//” to be combined with a “/0”. Right now, you can use a macro for that if you’d like.
Any feedback or suggestions you might have about the datablock changes, VCI, or any ERAM functionality can be sent directly to me at zgood2@comcast.net or you can text me at 206-276-7205.
EAD7: The first version of EAD7 is being keysited next week by ZFW and ZAB. The main new functionality for controllers in EAD7 is the Auto Pointout, which will let you send and approve pointouts through datablock and ACL indicators, without making phone calls. You’ll get more info in the EAD7 briefings and ELMs. The plan is for an operational EAD7 build to be released late summer/early fall.
Tech Refresh: We’ll be getting new replacement D-side monitors soon. The new monitors are 24” and will have new processors installed to support them. The ACL, DL, and GPD displayed on the new monitors will be the same size they are now. The widescreen D-side displays will allow display of DatComm menus and views.
Also new R-position monitors are being evaluated and will be selected for deployment soon. I’ll get more info to you when it becomes available.
DataComm: DataComm is coming, with the first keysite (ZKC) set to begin controller DataComm Training in early summer 2018. The plan is for ZKC to turn on DataComm in Fall of 2018. For us at ZSE, we’re scheduled to be #20 in the deployment, so we’ll be turning DataComm on here in late 2019/early 2020. You’ll get a lot more info on DataComm and DataComm Training in the next year. The basic DataComm controller training is a 3-day course, classroom and TTL scenarios, and a 1-day refresher course.
Let me know if you have any questions or suggestions!
Thank you,
Anthony Goodwin
ZSE NATCA Facility Tech Rep
206-276-7205
Just kidding. There's plenty. Please click the link below and you can see the designs and colors available. After that, it's just $10 per shirt and $30 per hoodie. As soon as we get 35 or more orders we'll be able to have them made and shipped. The sooner you purchase, the sooner you get them. Big thanks to Drew Stewart for taking the time and making this happen. Don't delay, buy today (I'm embarrassed for putting that).
