Comment

A are Update: CIC class is upcoming

CIC class

ZSE will be holding a one-day CIC class on May 8. During my time as rep, my standpoint about our controllers becoming CICs is that I don’t want to send anyone to the class against their will — provided that we have other CIC options across our various crews.

That being said, if you’re a CPC and you’re interested in becoming a CIC, please let me know.

Certifications

Congratulations to our newest A area CPC, Zach Nelson, who finished training last week!!

Congrats to Jessi Dias for getting certified on R2/32 and to Jared Fenton for getting R1/31.

New trainees

We received two more Academy graduates this past week. Their names are Taylor Choate and Cody Edwards. Please go upstairs to the training department and introduce yourselves when able.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

Another Article 5 solicitation

I received word from the agency that they will be holding a three-person R-side class between Aug. 21-Oct. 20 and need an Article 5 volunteer to provide instruction in the lab. That person will be instructing in the TTL Monday through Friday each week to accommodate the class.

Please let me know if you are interested in volunteering.

Horse collars

Now that we have had the new radar scopes for a while, I would like to eliminate the paper horse collars and only use the electronic ones. The B and D areas only use the electronic ones, and the C area only has a couple of the paper ones.

Before we get rid of our paper copies, though, I want to get feedback from the area. Please let me know if you would like to keep them or get rid of them.

An expectation that everyone trains

I have had conversations with Russ about the way that we go about selecting OJTIs and what our expectations as an area are for training. I would like us to get to a place where the expectation is that everyone should be available as an OJTI, rather than selectively only choosing some people as an OJTI. I think making that change will be more fair to everyone in the area.

Once someone has gone through the course, we will assign them training and see if they are a good fit with a specific student. If they are, they’ll train them. If they’re not, we’ll wait until we believe they are a good fit with another student in the future.

In all of this, making sure that we line up all of our trainees with the best possible fit will continue to be paramount to me.

Because of how absurdly short we are, we can’t send everyone to the next OJTI course. However, if you’re not currently an OJTI, expect to go to a training class as our staffing permits.

Certification

Congrats to Zack Reeves for getting certified on D3/12!

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A area update: Farewell to Ron

Bon voyage to Ron

After more than 21 years as an A area controller at Seattle ARTCC, Ron Warness is leaving the A area to become a staff-support specialist at Seattle TRACON.

Thanks to Ron for all of his contributions to our area over the years. His last shift is on Friday (tomorrow). If you’re around, make sure you tell him goodbye. He’s scheduled to work a 1330B overtime shift (one last OT for the road).

YKM landers

A few of you kindly brought to my attention the fact that YKM landers have not been descending in a timely manor since Spokane TRACON took over the Yakima sector. I reached out to their rep and requested that they descend the airplanes to 100 when we ship them over. She was very receptive to this request and said she will pass it along to their controllers.

Conversely, she asked me to convey to you all that they’re still working on figuring out their new airspace, and she requested patience from us while that is happening. They got less than 10 hours on each sector before becoming certified on them, so they’re definitely still getting their feet wet.

New A area personnel

Welcome to Zach Rush, a transferring CPC from Chinook, who becomes the third Zach in the area (phonetically speaking). He was previously a trainee in the B area.

And welcome to Derek Harris and Anthony Greer, who are both academy graduates.

Please go upstairs when you’re able and introduce yourself to them.

Article 5 solicitations

With these additions, we will need an Article 5 volunteer — or volunteers — to train them in their respective labs. Zach Rush’s lab will be June 6-20, with the new D-side lab to follow June 21-Aug. 18. 

Please let me know if you are interested in volunteering to instruct for one or both of these time blocks.

IST cadre volunteers

Our semiannual IST training is upcoming, and the training department is requesting cadre volunteers. The cadre class will be March 14-15 or March 16-17 (you would get to choose which two-day block you’d like). The actual IST training will take place between April 23 and May 6.

Given how destitute our staffing is, I am very reluctant to offer up anyone from our area to teach IST (especially if no one is interested). However, if you are interested in teaching the class, please let me know and we will try to see whether our staffing would allow you off the schedule for the required time.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A area update: Getting out of OT if you're going to be out of town

Article 38 reminder

As our area continues to get pummeled by unwanted overtime assignments, I wanted to remind everyone about a provision tucked into our contract. Section 4 of Article 38 (overtime) states:

An employee shall be relieved of an overtime assignment when, in the judgment of the agency:

a. The health or efficiency of the employee may be impaired; or

b. personal circumstances make it impossible for the employee to perform the overtime duty.

Part B seldomly gets used at ZSE, but I want to remind you all that you are entitled to get out of a specific overtime shift if you have something on your calendar that prevents you from being at work (i.e., you’re going to be out of town). In this event, I would advise your supe after you’ve been assigned the OT shift that you have personal circumstances preventing you from working it. You may need to provide them with a copy of airline tickets or hotel receipts.

This video by Natca Northwest Mountain has more info about this.

Please let me know if you utilize this provision of the contract and get any pushback from management.


S46 LOA being finalized

Derek Adams put in a ton of work on our behalf to negotiate the new S46 LOA. Those negotiations are mostly complete, and airspace is working to finalize the new letter.

Once airspace is finished with their work, the LOA gets sent off to the region for final approval. After that happens, the workforce will be briefed on the changes and the LOA will go into effect in conjunction with a chart change. Airspace told me yesterday that they estimate that will happen sometime in the spring.

The kids are growing up (and my how we need them to)

Since my last update, several of our trainees have received certifications.

Mike Draper got certified on R3/12, becoming our newest CPC. Zach Nelson got certified on R1/31. Jared Fenton and Mike Sampson both got certified on R2/32.

Luke Bradley got certified on D1/31. Kyle Moore got certified on D2/32. Zack Reeves got certified on D1/31. And – last but not least – Tucker Enzien got certified on D2/32.

Congratulations to all of you. Keep going. We need you. Really bad.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A area update: 2023 bidding complete

Bidding complete

Damien and I sat down with management to adjudicate AWS requests on Thursday, and our 2023 bidding process is now complete. We were able to approve at least something for all but three of the controllers who submitted requests. Click here to see the finalized 2023 lines for CPCs.

Bid book opening on Wednesday

Damien has been working to enter all of the 2023 leave into Web Schedules, and you can enter spot-leave requests online beginning on Wednesday, Nov. 9 at 10 p.m. PT.

Overtime preference

During the bidding process, we requested that everyone submit their 2023 OT preference via a link on bidATC. I will be taking those responses in the near future and tabulating them on a sheet that I’ll place by our headset boxes.

Once that list is there, please double-check that your preference is what you entered. If you didn’t enter anything on bidATC, please note your preference on that list.

If we don’t receive anything, your OT preference will remain the same as it currently is.

As a reminder, your 2023 OT preference will go into effect beginning on Jan. 1. Overtime will be assigned for the 2023 pay periods that are contractually required to be published before Jan. 1 using the current OT preference list.

If you want your OT preference to change before Jan.1, let a member of management know.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A area update: 2023 bidding continues

Round 1 of bidding for CPCs is complete, and we’re underway with Round 2. Thank you all for bidding so promptly.

Trainees will begin bidding this evening.

Blank forms to make your AWS requests – the so-called dream sheets – have been left on the table in our area that’s by the aisle.

All of your requests are due by Sunday, Oct. 30 at noon. Damien and I will then sit down with management to adjudicate them on Thursday, Nov. 3.

As a reminder, if you have a request that you want – even if it’s something you’re not sure can be accommodated – please fill out a sheet. The more requests that are received, the more likely it is that requests can be approved.

I appreciate everyone who took the time to respond to my survey request. Sixty-nine percent of respondents said that they prefer we continue to determine AWS requests based on seniority, and so that is how we will continue to determine them.

I make mistakes

Speaking of my survey, it was kindly pointed out to me that I asked you in the survey whether we should move the 1/31 boundary, which is not at all what I wanted to ask (Insert face palm gif here). I intended to ask about whether we should move the 1/32 line. I don’t want to move the 1/31 boundary at this time. I am, however, very interested in your feedback about whether we should give more airspace to Sector 1 on the south part of the sector, which obviously abuts 32. Accordingly, I have created another survey in the spirit of gathering accurate information.

Please click here to vote on it.

As far as changing our transfer of control procedures to give A area sectors control with respect to the transferring controller’s airspace: I received near-unanimous interest in doing that. Therefore, I will be advocating for that change with our airspace office in the near future.

Certifications

While it’s in my brain, I want to recognize Luke Bradley for getting certified on D2/32 and Kyle Moore for getting certified on D1/31. Good work, gentlemen.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A area update: Bidding season is almost here

BWS negotiations

Our ZSE bid MOUs for 2023 have been signed, and bidding time is nearly here.

The 2023 A area basic-watch schedule mirrors the proposed schedule that has been floating around the area for the past couple of weeks.

The only addition to that proposed schedule is that if you bid a mid line on Monday-Tuesday RDOs, you will have the option of selecting a 00NF mid or a 2230 mid. Everything else in our previously proposed schedule is the schedule we’ll be bidding on.

The plan is to brief the workforce over the next week and begin bidding next weekend.

With that in mind, now is the time to log into bidATC.com and verify your log-in information. I already received a report of a controller trying to sign in and having to reset their password. Please check now so as to make our bidding as seamless as possible. Once you’ve logged in, please check that you have your desired communications method selected.

Survey time

With bidding around the corner, I’m soliciting feedback for how we collaboratively determine requests for alternate work schedules (the so-called dream lines).

We – the union and management – currently adjudicate these requests by seniority (i.e., we look at a request, and if more than one person wants the same thing, the person with the higher seniority gets it). A year ago we were able to approve at least something for every single controller that submitted a sheet in the A area except one person (sorry Chatty).

I received a suggestion from one of our controllers that we change how we adjudicate dream-line requests to make it based on crews first and seniority second. As an example: If there are multiple requests, the person whose crew is closer to their weekend would get the request. Were there to still be a tie, the person on the crew with the most seniority would get it.

My two cents on this issue: Having worked a mid for a few years, the last day of the week is irrelevant to me and about half of our controllers that also have a mid. Therefore, I would prefer to stick with the way we currently determine these, as the requests that I would potentially have wouldn’t happen on the last day of my work week. While I am in the bottom-quarter of seniority for our CPCs, it makes sense to me that people with higher seniority should be able to get what they want if the request can be approved to cover what their previous shift was. However, I am curious how you all feel, and I’m open to advocating that we change the process if there is interest in changing it.

In addition to the dream-line question, I would like feedback on two airspace-related matters:

1, How would the area feel about changing our transfer-of-control procedures intra-area? I am strongly interested in updating them so that we have control between A area sectors for turns of up to 30 degrees, altitude changes, and speed changes with respect to the transferring controller’s airspace. We already do this with all of the surrounding high-altitude sectors in ZSE airspace, as well as all of Vancouver. I believe that not shipping an airplane until you’ve resolved all conflicts in your sector is ATC 101, and so why not release control once we’re done?

This would be a big change — it would alter how we control the northbound airplanes from Sector 32 to Sector 12, for example — and therefore I want to start by finding out whether people would support that change.

2, Would you support moving the boundary between Sector 1 and 32 to give Sector 1 more airspace? In effect, we would move the 1/32 boundary south to make it parallel with the 47 boundary. The purpose of the change would be to give Sector 1 the ability to turn airplanes left during periods of metering or when other traffic situations warrant. (As Eric Hartley wisely once said, “When you’re boxed in, you’ve got to think outside the box.”)

Please click on the survey here to complete it. You’ll need to sign in on a Google account to do so.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A Area update: Forks Corridor and Olympic/W237 airspace

Over the past few months, there have been multiple instances of A area controllers manually turning off Olympic/W237 airspace. This has the unintended consequence of deleting any subsequent scheduled airspace activations for whatever airspace gets turned off.

I believe this is happening after Downrigger calls Sector 3 to advise that they’re done with the Forks Corridor and the associated airspace.

When we get this call, it is our job to manually turn off the Forks Corridor (via the “Airspace status” button in the EDST and not the display setting on the radar scope). If you want to show Olympic/W237 airspace as cold, call the TMU mission coordinator and have them turn it off.

Our job is the Forks Corridor and theirs is the airspace. (If you’re wondering why, TMU did not want to be involved in the Forks Corridor being depicted as airspace on the scope, and we said, “OK fine, we’ll turn it on and off ourselves.”)

The airspace and procedures office will be sending out an update about this in the near future, but I wanted to send out a reminder in the meantime. Please let me or Mathew Coughlin, our trusty airspace rep, know if you have any questions.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A Area update: ‘Tis the season for scheduling negotiations

BWS negotiations

Awhile back Patrick asked me to send out a survey he made about schedules. The conclusions: Most people are potentially interested in a BWS line of four 10-hour shifts. A lot of people are at least somewhat interested in straight day shifts. Quite a few people are interested in straight swings. Some people are interested in rotating a week of day shifts and swing shifts. Some people were interested in the idea of biannual or trimester bidding.

I’ve had conversations since then with Damien and Derek about what we should be advocating for when we negotiate our 2023 BWS with the agency.

I would love to add multiple lines of 4 10-hour days to our schedule, but having them in 2023 isn’t realistic for several reasons. 1, we couldn’t balance the schedule with multiple people on 10-hour days. 2, it would force people on the no-list to have two OT shifts per week instead of one. 3, the agency will not allow us to incur the additional burden of those OTs.

As for the other ideas: We’re concerned about creating lines with straight days and straight swings and having that negatively affect the bottom part of our seniority (i.e., if you’re near the bottom of seniority, I don’t want you to be forced onto W-Th. straight swings). And I’m also concerned that biannual or trimester bidding would negatively affect controllers in the bottom part of our seniority. (And making that kind of a change would be a huge process that would have to be discussed across the entire facility, whether other areas want to adopt it or not.)

Resultantly, we will be advocating for a BWS schedule in 2023 that is similar to what we have this year. The long-term goal is for us to continue to rebuild our area through as much training as we can accommodate so that we can get to staffing levels that would support some of the changes that Patrick’s survey proposed and people expressed interest in.

I sat down informally with Russ on Sunday to begin negotiating our schedule, and Damien and I are scheduled to sit down with the agency on Friday to continue working on that process.

On Sunday, we tentatively agreed to our 2023 guides, which will remain the same as 2022 except that Saturday and Sunday day shifts will increase from 9 to 10 during the summer.

We discussed a number of possible changes, and I would like feedback from the area about a few of them:

  • The agency wants to eliminate our 1600 shift and make it an additional 1530 (except, of course, the 1600NFs). The way we currently run the floor, I don’t feel like I can legitimately push back against this (even though I know that there are a handful of you that do love having the late shift). However, my concern is that traffic will return to pre-pandemic levels and we’ll need to have Sector 3 open past 11 p.m. If we eliminate the 16 and make it a 1530, we’re not guaranteed to have more than two bodies past 11. I think I’d lean toward allowing the agency to change them from 16s to 1530s, with the understanding that they’ll have to use OT if we run into situations where we can’t close Sector 3 by 11. However, I’d like feedback from you all about whether that makes sense or not to you.

  • The agency wants to move one of our 0800 shifts to a 0900. We have tentatively agreed to let them do this on Saturday because we have the 16NFs that day. However, I really do not want us to have that shift the rest of the week. We have collaboratively agreed upon our hour-by-hour guides, and my argument to them is that we stick with those guides and staff accordingly. If we go to a 1530 instead of 16, we’d have everyone on the swing at work by 3:30 p.m., so to me it’s pointless to force someone to stay late. From our preliminary discussions, I said I’d solicit feedback from all you about a 0900 shift. Would you prefer to have a 9 or an 8?

  • Does anyone object to eliminating the 2245 mid and making it a 2230? I have asked around and can’t think of a single reason why we have the 2245, but I wanted to ask to make sure I’m not missing anything?

Before I move on, I just want to add one thing: Damien has been instrumental in helping us get ready to sit down with management to negotiate all of these things. He does a ton of work for us, and I want to highlight that fact. He’s a rockstar with our schedule, and I feel lucky that we have him in our area.

S46 CWG

The collaborative work group that’s reviewing our LOA was scheduled to be completed by Sept. 1. However, the CWG has only met once since it began last spring — due primarily to scheduling challenges over at S46. Resultantly, the CWG will be extended for three months.

Based on our initial discussions, I anticipate there being a lot of tweaks to the LOA, but that it will substantively be similar to what we’re currently doing. Tyler and Steve love giving me a hard time about calling our friends at S46 our “brothers and sisters.” I have been trying to make clear to our brothers and sisters over there that the biggest thing we’d like to see improved is their departure separation.

They proposed a 60-day trial of assigning 270 KTS to departing jets. According to the ATM at S46, KSEA is one of only three Core 30 airports in the NAS that doesn’t have speed-control procedures for departures. I do believe that the best way for them to improve departure separation is to assign speeds.

At one point recently, it appeared that we were on the verge of agreeing on the framework for a speed-control trial — and then the airspace supe at S46 balked at the proposal and said he didn’t want to do it. My response to them is: If they’re not going to assign speeds, what are they going to do to improve departure separation? (Supposedly that supe has somewhat backed down since then, but we haven’t heard yet whether they’re in to do their own proposal or not.)

A area staffing

I want to clarify an item that got sent out in the notes from our recent all-members meeting. We badly need more controllers in our area to be able to continue to crawl out of the staffing hole that the agency has left us in. Over the past year, we’ve gotten more new trainees than any other area, and we need a lot more. In the conversations that I’ve had with management, no one is saying that we can’t take more controllers in the A area. The hope is that we will continue to get academy grads – and other controllers that transfer to the facility – while not overstressing our already-tight staffing.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A area update: Schedule survey

Schedule survey

Patrick has presented several ideas to me about how we could potentially change our basic watch schedule. To that end, he created a survey to gauge your interest in potential changes.

The survey isn’t any kind of a binding vote. Nothing will be determined definitively one way or the other based on what the results are. These ideas would have to be negotiated with management, and before we present them to management I’d want to ensure that our interests are protected individually and collectively.

That being said, I’m intrigued by some of the ideas that Patrick has and I’m very interested in what your feelings are.

With anything that we do, my goal is to try and advocate for things that the majority of our members want. So please take a moment to fill out this survey when you have time.

Click here to access it.

Certifications

Congrats to Katrina Linder and Kevin Wegner for completing our training program and becoming CPCs of the A area at ZSE!

Also, congrats to Mike Draper for becoming certified on R31 and R01, as well as Zach Nelson on R02 and R32.

And it’s been a while, but I wanted to recognize Jessie Dias for completing D03/D12/D02/D32. 

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A Area update: Article 5 volunteers

We need two Article 5 volunteers to instruct students in upcoming A area labs.

The first one will be for two D-side students Aug. 1-Sept. 16. The second one will be for one R-side student Sept. 19-Oct. 28.

Please let me know if you’re interested in volunteering for either of these.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

A Area update: New area airspace and training reps

Hello, everyone. It’s been awhile since my last update, and there are several items to fill you in on:

Airspace/procedures rep and training rep

Chatty is our new A Area airspace/procedures rep, and Kevin Thomson is our new A Area training rep.

I really appreciate everyone who volunteered for those positions.

DataComm volunteers

As you all know, DataComm implementation got delayed until next year. We need two volunteers to be part of the cadre for teaching it to the workforce.

The dates seem to change all of the time (quoth Gene Kranz in Apollo 13: “Tell me this isn’t a government operation.”). According to the most recent information I received, the cadre course will be 10-31 to 11-09, with the workforce training taking place between 1-5 to 3-23.

If you are interested in volunteering, please let me know.

S46 LOA CWG

A CWG to go through the ZSE-S46 LOA is scheduled to meet in the near future. Derek Adams will be our designated NATCA representative in this CWG, and Chatty, as our airspace rep, will be one of the SMEs.

If you have ideas/thoughts/suggestions about anything related to our S46 LOA, now is your chance. Please let me or Derek or Chatty know.

New academy graduates

We have two new graduates from the academy. Their names are Tucker Enzien and Zack Reeves (yep, our area faces another duplicate first-name situation 🤷‍♂️). I’m very excited to have them in our area. Please go upstairs and introduce yourselves when you’re able.

Gary Cozad

Gary Cozad advised me last week that he decided to resign from the FAA. He wanted me to let you all know he made that decision. Gary told me to tell the area that he is very grateful to everyone who’s reached out to him to offer help and kindness over the past year.

Solidarity event

Our local Eboard has been trying to broadcast information to the membership about our upcoming solidarity event, which will be held July 13 in Seattle.

Food and drinks will be provided aboard an Argosy Cruise and will include controllers from facilities throughout the area, as well as members of the national executive board.

If you have concerns that you want to be heard by the national officers of our union, this event will be an amazing opportunity to do so.

Click here to RSVP. You must RSVP by June 25.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

May 14, 2022 A Area update: Todd's going-away party

Laura will be hosting a going-away party for Todd Shibata tonight at her house, beginning at 4 p.m.

This is obviously not a union-sanctioned event, but Todd has been an enormous part of our area and will be sorely missed. (The only silver lining is that he will be returning to the bargaining unit.) Zimmy is in town from L.A. to be part of the festivities.

If you’re attending, please wear a Hawaiian shirt (if you have one) in honor of Todd’s island roots.

Trainees and spouses are both welcome to join.

Laura and Byron’s address:

34024 53rd AVE S

Auburn, WA

In Solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

April 23, 2022 A Area update: Summer staffing

I felt super proud to be an A area controller on Thursday and Friday as we handled all of the craziness associated with the president’s visit to Seattle. Thanks for all of your professionalism and skill over those two days.

Summer guides

I have been having a number of conversations among the E-board and management about our summer guides.

When Derek, Russ, and I negotiated our 2022 guides last summer (and by “negotiated” I mean that I sat in the room as a brand-new rep while Derek expertly took care of things), we collaboratively agreed that we would leave our guides the same as the previous year, which means that Monday-Friday between Memorial Day and the end of August we would staff one additional controller for the day shift and one additional controller for the swing shift. We then agreed to not initially staff to those guides because traffic levels hadn’t yet returned to pre-pandemic levels and our staffing is so low. We collaboratively agreed that we would revisit the guides when traffic levels got busier.

As you all know, traffic is getting busier.

The agency is projecting that ZSE will be back to 2019 traffic levels by mid-July.

We are obviously still ridiculously short in the area. On one hand, I’m cognizant that if we increase our guides, that means that many of you will be assigned even more unwanted overtime and it will be even harder for all of us to get leave that’s not titled “sick leave”.

I don’t like either of those things. We need to get to a place where we have less unwanted OT and a place where it’s easier for us to get leave.

Having said that, the safety of the operation is obviously paramount, and I want to make sure that we’re protected as traffic levels continue to increase. And we also need to have more staffing so that we have a chance to keep training during the busy time of the year.

I don’t think that we need to increase guides starting at Memorial Day, but I think they need to be higher before we hit the busiest time of the year.

Therefore, I am advocating that we increase our guides M-F (to 11 for day shifts and 10 for swing shifts) beginning on June 19 and continuing through the end of August. The agency seems to be on the same page about this, and I hope to finalize an agreement with Russ about it in the next week.

National Training Initiative

I recently participated in a briefing about the NTI, which was presented by members of the national CWG who created it.

On the floor, I’ve heard various members of management say a whole bunch of confusing and inaccurate things about the NTI.

In an effort to alleviate confusion and provide you all with the information that I have, here are some takeaways from that briefing:

  • Both the agency and NATCA want to get people certified as quickly as possible, which is the whole point of this. We all agree – and nowhere is it more obvious than in our area with the number of OT shifts we’re being assigned – that the sooner we can get more people certified, the better.

  • The CWG, composed of both NATCA and management, did a lot of research and determined that they expect trainees to receive 12-15 hours of OJT per week if they have certifications and 15-18 hours if they don’t. This is not a requirement. The word that the agency and NATCA agreed upon is “expectation.”

  • The agency tracks every day whether trainees receive OJT for that day. I’ve heard management say numerous times on the floor that trainees “need” to get three hours of OJT per day, but that’s not a thing. They do track OJT on a daily basis, but there’s no daily expectation.

  • The NTI recognizes that situations will arise that prevent students from achieving the expected hours of OJT. The point of tracking it every day is so that they can go back and identify impediments to training in an effort to ensure that trainees get their time in subsequent weeks.

  • The CWG said that nothing in the NTI is intended to be punitive. I’ve heard the agency talking locally about how so-and-so needs to get blank-number-of-minutes training, or else they’re going to “have” to go back and look at the entire week to figure out why so-and-so didn’t get their time. To that I say, “OK, have at it.” It’s great for them to figure out how we can do better. However, should anyone ever come to you and say something like, “Hey you were on CIC and didn’t get so-and-so their training time. That’s unacceptable,” please let me know.

TAV Cadre

We need two volunteers to assist with administering our area-specific training for the new terrain maps, which are scheduled to go into effect this August.

The two volunteers will work day shifts on June 13-14 off the control floor to help finalize a PowerPoint presentation that the airspace office has been building. Then they’d work day shifts M-F between July 11-22 to administer the training to the area.

If you’re interested let me know as soon as possible.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

March 10, 2022 A Area update: All-members meeting next week

All-members meeting

As a reminder, the E-board will be holding a ZSE all-members meeting on Wednesday, March 16 from  11 a.m. to 1 p.m. in the East-West conference room. Lunch will be provided. If you have agenda items that you would like to see included, please let me or another member of the E-board know. Hearing your voices is incredibly important to us, and we want to know what you’d like to have discussed as a membership.

Topics on the agenda thus far include:

  • New WiFi protocols

  • 2023 bidding

  • Your vision for our local

  • Article 18 of the contract (CICs)

If you aren't scheduled to work during that time but have input on any of those topics — or anything else not listed — please let me know ahead of time so your voice can be heard.

Volunteer for flight strip-CWG group

ZSE will be having a CWG in the near future to address ways that we can reduce flight strips in our facility. The goal is to have at least one participant from each area, and I want to make sure that ours gets represented.

Let me know if you’re interested in volunteering for this.

Volunteer for IST cadre

Even though we just completed IST, it’s already time to solicit volunteers to be in the cadre for next year’s training. If you are interested in volunteering as a member of the IST cadre, please let me know.

Sector names

Other areas at ZSE have expressed interest in using sector names instead of numbers to avoid confusion over the shout lines. Please advise me if you feedback one way or the other about whether you’d like to see our area sectors named.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

Feb. 11, 2022 A area update: Working with S46

I went over to Seattle Approach this week to sit down with their rep. I visited with him pretty extensively, and I also briefly met with some of their controllers and their ATM.

Some takeaways from my visit:

- They recognize that they’ve struggled with departure spacing and want to get better. They’ve been discussing a lot of ideas and are open to ideas that we have.

In particular, they’re very interested in adding speed control to departing aircraft. They are working on an agreement with Seattle Tower where the tower would give them 230 KTS on all jet departures, and they’re proposing that they assign a faster speed before they ship them to us (the discussions have been surrounding either 250 KTS or 270 KTS). All aircraft would be our control for speeds on contact. I indicated to them that I want feedback from our membership before agreeing to anything, but I do think that it makes sense and would help both us and them. Instead of getting overtakes, all airplanes would come over going the same speed. We would get a much more consistent product. SEA is one of only three Core 30 FAA airports that doesn’t have assigned speeds on departure, and I think it makes sense to fall in line with what almost all of the busier airports across the NAS are doing.

I’m very interested in your feedback on this subject, so please let me know what thoughts you have.

- Our friends in TMU will randomly ask us to assign all A/C on the MARNR arrival 250 KTS at MARNR in a south flow, which is really a pain for us because of the extra phraseology. I’m not a fan of doing this. Having said that, their rep wanted me to convey that it is very helpful to them, and that if they’re asking for it they need it. I pointed out that BOANE is literally six miles from MARNR and that the restriction is 250KTS there. The problem is that they take the majority of airplanes on the MARNR arrival off it for sequencing, and since they can’t slow them until they’re inside of their airspace, they’re stuck with an airplane doing 270 KTS that they’re trying to sequence with a plane on the HAWKZ that’s doing 210 KTS.

We agreed to work on changing the arrival restriction to 250 KTS so that we don’t have to give the extra verbiage (and they can speed aircraft back up if they want), but in the meantime know that if S46 asks for 250 KTS at MARNR, it’s because they really need it.

- Over the years, whenever a supe comes up to me and says, “I just talked to TMU, and they need you to spin this heavy,” I’ve almost always rolled my eyes. However, their rep showed me the spacing requirements they have between SEA heavy aircraft and BFI landers. The more heavies that they have, the more complex their operation becomes. If the supe asks you to spin a heavy, it’s probably because an S46 controller has gotten tubed and needs help. So help them.

- From our perspective, the HAWKZ arrival “works” in a north flow in the sense that it allows us to give S46 airplanes 5 miles in trail. However, the arrival works really, really poorly for approach. They only have a tiny bit of time before airplanes turn onto final. Over the years, many things have been done to try and address this, including having us provide 10 miles-in-trail on the HAWKZ. Our friends in TMU raised that idea to me when I was a brand-new rep … and I promptly told them no. I’m all for us helping, but 10 miles in trail when it’s north flow is so much work for us to do to basically compensate for the arrival being broken.

To me, the solution is that we need to fix the arrival for north flow.

I proposed to S46 that we reinvestigate moving the arrival inside of S46’s airspace so that it goes to the west side of R6703 during a north operation. This has been considered before and then dropped. I am all in favor of trying to make it happen, and so is S46. The attitude of a lot of people has been, “It takes years to change an arrival.” OK, so let’s get going. Let’s try and fix the arrival so that it works better for everyone. I don’t know whether it will get off the ground — I would anticipate there being environmental concerns and pushback from airlines — but I want to at least try.

- Because of COVID, we haven’t been able to visit S46 over the past two years. However, I am very interested in getting our controllers over there to talk to their controllers as we’re able and our staffing allows. And our friends at S46 expressed interest in getting their controllers over to ZSE to talk to us. I think the more conversations that we have controller-to-controller, the better. They’re our NATCA brothers and sisters over there. When you don’t see someone besides the landline lighting up and answering, it can be easy to forget that. But they are human beings who want to do a good job, and I want us to have more interactions as it’s safe to do so.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

Feb. 3, 2022 A area update: We need an Article 5 volunteer

Article 5 solicitation

We need an Article 5 volunteer to train an R-side student in the lab between April 11-May 27. If you are interested, please let me know as soon as possible.

A couple of things to note: This lab has been shifted because of COVID, and the dates are subject to revision. However, with COVID cases currently falling, my best guess — for whatever that’s worth — is that the lab will happen during that period of time. If you pull out your calendar, you’ll see that the first week of the lab is slated to be during spring break. If this is a dealbreaker and you’d otherwise be interested, please let me know.

Published OT notification

Our local MOU on OT states:

“All overtime shall be assigned/cancelled using one of the following methods: in person, in writing, via telephone conversation, or CEDAR.”

When new schedules are published, management has accomplished this requirement by creating an MOU and placing it in each of our mail boxes.

Considering the ridiculous amount of OT assignments that we have in the area, this has become a colossal waste of ink and paper. Going forward, I advised management that it’s acceptable for them to place a copy of the published OT list by the headset cabinet in lieu of printing off individual copies.

They should still advise you of non-published OT assignments as they previously have — i.e., via any of the methods mentioned above.



In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

Jan. 21, 2022 A Area update: Downrigger delight

Downrigger

Downrigger made its return to our operation on Thursday. I think that it will overall be a really helpful change, but there will certainly be growing pains in the interim. (If you worked on Thursday or Friday, you already know this.)

The biggest thing I would like to communicate about Downrigger: If you have questions, please let me or a supe know so that we can get you answers.

Some answers to issues that have arisen so far:

  • In STARS, WWF is the Downrigger West sector and WWH is the Downrigger East sector. The handoff should forward to the appropriate sector if they’re combined. If you address the handoff to W it should automatically flash to the appropriate Downrigger sector if NUW is configured correctly.

  • NUW Approach has been asked to call five minutes or less from activation, and they agreed to do this. (On the first two days, they often called 30 minutes ahead of time. It may take a little time for that info to get disseminated on their side, but they should be calling five minutes or less from when they’ll take the airspace.)

  • NUW Approach needs to ask for a reason if they want the Forks Corridor at higher than 130 (and they agreed they would start giving a reason if they ask for higher). If there is weather, I am all for letting them have higher, but in general the intent of this operation is for them to have 090-130, and then we control the airspace below and above. (Someone suggested we have them work the airspace from the surface to the top altitude, which I love. However, NUW only agreed to work it starting at 090. In future conversations, I would like to discuss having them assume the airspace to the surface because all of that low-level airspace is dead space, and it would be great to not have them call us for point outs on CLM arrivals.)

  • I was told we had multiple aircraft on Day 1 returning to NUW that had flown past the confines of the Forks corridor and were above 090 enter our airspace without a point out. I had Paul remind them that they’re responsible for pointing out any of those aircraft.

  • When the airspace times out, we reassume the airspace whether they call us or not.

  • Aircraft outbound to Downrigger must be routed over the appropriate fixes for you to be able to hand them off. I placed a copy of those fixes at Sector 3. All of the aircraft departing NUW for the airspace should have the necessary fix in their stereo routes. If you have an aircraft that you’re trying to hand off to Downrigger but you can’t get it to flash, check that the necessary fix is in the route. If it is, have the supe/CIC verify that flight data has run the appropriate script. I would then recommend doing a manual handoff and please let me or a supe know after the fact so that the issue gets fixed.

  • There have been instances of aircraft autopopping our scopes while they’re in the Olympic MOA (with Downrigger active). Airspace is working on a solution to this problem, but it may take a while because they have to do a lot of stuff under the ERAM hood to pin down the problem.

For now, you can pull up the line for the Forks corridor by selecting the Darrington button, which is less than ideal. I welcome feedback about the best way to display this going forward. I anticipate the corridor being in use often. Some have suggested we light up the corridor like we do SUA. Some have suggested we create a separate tearoff button for it (so you don’t have to see Darrington all of the time). Some have suggested adding it to the SAA page. All of those are possibilities.

Please let me know if you have a preference or a different idea for displaying the corridor on our maps.

Alternate rep

Derek Adams has been confirmed by the E-board as my alternate rep for the 2022-23 cycle. I really appreciate him being willing to help me.

Training rep and airspace rep

I would like to add an area rep for training and airspace/procedures in the near future.

The duties for the training rep would entail routinely reviewing our training paperwork and ensuring that required things — i.e., skills checks and training-team meetings — get completed. You would receive official time to do that. There was an effort made a few years ago to establish area-level training reps, but it fell away. However, we recently discussed this as an E-board and I love the idea of having someone in this role to help make sure that our training is in compliance.

The duties of the airspace rep would entail working with myself and airspace on developing new procedures for our area. This would include participating in CWGs — ie, when we redo our LOA with S46.

Please let me know if you’re interested in either of these positions.

CA-1

You didn’t think I’d get through an entire update without talking about COVID, did you? Well here we are.

This has been mentioned by myself and others, but to reiterate: In the event that you test positive for COVID, I recommend filing a CA-1 as soon as possible. To do so, you’ll need a positive test result (which obviously has been taking some people a lot of time to obtain right now). As soon as your CA-1 has been accepted, you will begin a continuation of pay — ie, you don’t have to use any of your own leave — that will backdate from the date of your positive test and continue for up to 45 days.

If you do test positive and need help with your CA-1, let me know and I will email you a step-by-step list by Stephanie Winder, who is the NATCA NNM guru for CA-1s.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

Jan. 12 A Area update: COVID and lots of other things

OK, this is going to be a long one.

To start (and it’s a shocker!): COVID-19 and Omicron have obviously been dominating our lives.

Amy sent out an update last weekend that covered a variety of topics, and I highly recommend you read through it if you haven’t already.

Of the many things she touched on, I want to emphasize one thing: Please don’t come into work if you’re sick.

I have been joking for the seven years I’ve been an FAA employee that “if you’re not feeling well, you’re not feeling well,” and you should take sick leave. It’s no longer a joke. With the transmissibility of this variant, please do not come into work if you have any COVID symptoms. For those of us who are vaccinated and boosted and are lucky enough to be in good health, actually getting COVID doesn’t seem like a big deal. But there are people inside of this building who live with family members who are immunocompromised. I understand that it can feel futile and that we’re all tired of dealing with COVID, but please help protect these people by not coming into work if you’re sick.

And also protect yourself. When you step inside the building every day, you are saying that you have completed the wellness check and are symptom-free. If this changes at some point during your shift, advise a supervisor so that you can go home. If you are at work, you have said via the wellness check that you’re symptom-free, so if you get asked during work to fill out a close-contact form, I highly recommend that you provide an answer that’s consistent with your original answer.

S46 meeting

We recently had a Zoom meeting between the LSCs of S46 and the A area, which I sat in on. We discussed many things. There were a few things I wanted to pass along:

  • If you are sequencing on the long legs and your sequence is very tight, S46’s LSC said that APREQing the front A/C going fast typically is not a problem for them. I obviously don’t recommend calling them and doing this on a regular basis, but I thought it was good information to pass along if you get in a pinch.

  • If you’re about to be given a stack of departures by S46 and you have a solution to the traffic situation in mind, please call them and offer the solution. Some of our controllers have the mentality of, “Well, these four airplanes headed my way are all in approach’s airspace and this is their traffic.” Yes, it is currently their traffic. But it’s going to be your traffic. So if you have a solution in mind that will help you and them, they asked for us to be proactive in reaching out and offering it.

  • Both sides expressed interest in having our controllers visit each others’ facilities. This is obviously not currently happening due to COVID. However, when the opportunity presents itself, I would love to get as many people as possible over there to have conversations between us and them.

Speed control

The major topic we discussed with S46 was speed control on the arrivals. The common scenario (which is applicable to all of the arrivals) that we reviewed: We’ve sped up an aircraft on the HAWKZ to 290kts or greater to accomplish our sequencing, and we then tell the aircraft, “Resume published speed at PIKEZ.” According to the way I have interpreted the AIM, I expect the airplane to slow to cross PIKEZ at 250kts, and then comply with the slower published speeds. However, S46 has had several airplanes come over doing 290kts overhead PIKEZ, with the intent to begin their speed reduction at that point. Those aircraft had all been assigned, “Resume published speed at PIKEZ.”

In my opinion, this is a pilot deviation. However, I’ve since had several conversations with our airspace office about this, and they were provided with an unofficial interpretation from the region saying that “resume published speed at PIKEZ” is not approved because pilots could remain fast until they reach the fix. They suggested you say, “Resume published speed” when you want them to slow (which doesn’t work if you’re busy and can’t advise the airplane at the exact moment you want them to slow), or “cross PIKEZ at 250kts, then resume published speed.”

I don’t believe the unofficial interpretation is sufficient and that we need more concrete information. Therefore, I have requested we get an official interpretation from national. I’m told this will take a few months to get back.

In the meantime, just be aware that there is confusion among pilots about what “resume published speed at (fix)” means and that if you tell them, “Resume published speeds at PIKEZ,” they may or may not do what you want them to do. I have begun adapting my phraseology with pilots to ensure that they do what I want them to do — I say “cross PIKEZ at 270kts, then resume published speeds,” or “comply with the published speeds beginning at PIKEZ.”

S46 LOA update

We will be putting together a CWG in the near future to look at updating the S46 LOA. If you’re interested in participating, please let me know. And also let me know if there are any S46-related procedures you would like to see changed or modified in the new LOA. (And please let me know if you have any requests for any changes to any of the other LOAs and procedures that we have in the area.)

Downrigger

Downrigger is scheduled to return in the near future. Our airspace office won’t be giving in-person briefings due to COVID, but they told me they’ll be placing an update into CEDAR this week. If you have questions about any of the new procedures, please let me know and I will get answers for you.

“1330B” instead of “1330NF”

The dreaded 1330NF shift returned to our facility this year at the behest of management, which said it intended to use that shift to help facilitate crew breakouts. I agreed to this as a brand-new rep, and I intend to push for us to abolish it next year if management doesn’t actually utilize it for breakouts.

In the meantime, it’s here for this year.

Per our BWS MOU, the “core” shift that we agreed upon was “1330B.” The MOU states that “any B designation on any shift indicates that the shift shall have up to a 10-minute flex time prior to the start time.”

An OM in another area recently objected to the schedulers using the coding “1330NF” because it isn’t in line with the MOU. Accordingly, starting with PP5, you’ll start seeing “1330B” if you have a 1330NF shift. You still can flex in up to 10 minutes ahead of the start time. The only thing changing is the coding in Web Scheduler.

Certifications

Training obviously became paused this week, but we’ve had several certifications since my last area update. They are: Jessi Dias (D1/31), Angelina Jacobson (D2/32), Mike Draper (R2/32), Katrina Linder (R1/31), and Kevin Wegner (R1/31). I appreciate all of our trainees, who have been enduring so much insanity during COVID.

In solidarity,

Dan Rasmussen

801-860-3821

Comment

Comment

Nov. 18 A Area update: All-members meeting tomorrow morning

ZSE all-members meeting on Friday

This is a reminder that we will be holding a ZSE all-members meeting tomorrow morning (Friday) at 10 a.m. online and in-person (in the East-West conference room). Regional VP Alex Navarro III, formerly of this beautiful facility, will be on hand to answer questions, address concerns, and receive feedback.

There will be coffee and pastries available for those of you who are able to attend in-person.

If you will be attending virtually, here is the information to join:

TELCON INFO:

Friday, November 19th @1000 PST

Microsoft Teams meeting

Join on your computer or mobile app

Click here to join the meeting

Or call in (audio only)

+1 253-240-0613,,335054440# United States, Tacoma

Phone Conference ID: 335 054 440#

Comment